Valstybė kaip ginčo šalis tarptautiniame komerciniame arbitraže
Ravluševičius, Pavelas | Darbo gynimo komisijos narys / Thesis Defence Board Member |
Tamavičiūtė, Vitalija | Darbo gynimo komisijos narys / Thesis Defence Board Member |
Samuilytė, Aistė | Darbo gynimo komisijos narys / Thesis Defence Board Member |
Soloveičikas, Deividas | Darbo gynimo komisijos narys / Thesis Defence Board Member |
Šaltinytė, Loreta | Recenzentas / Rewiewer |
Gabartas, Herkus | Darbo gynimo komisijos narys / Thesis Defence Board Member |
Vėgėlė, Ignas | Darbo gynimo komisijos pirmininkas / Thesis Defence Board Chairman |
Šiame magistro baigiamajame darbe analizuojamos valstybės kaip ginčo šalies tarptautiniame komerciniame arbitraže lemiamos teorinės ir praktinės problemos tiriant tarptautinio komercinio arbitražo, arbitražo šalių bei valstybės kaip ginčo šalies tarptautiniame komerciniame arbitraže sampratas. Taip pat analizuojamas galimas įpareigojimų sukūrimas, arbitražinio susitarimo nesudariusioms šalims, valstybės imuniteto tarptautiniame komerciniame arbitraže klausimai bei kiti arbitražo proceso, kuomet viena ginčo šalių - valstybė - ypatumai. Be to, paskutinėje šio magistro baigiamojo darbo dalyje analizuojama Lietuvos Respublikos, kaip ginčo šalies tarptautiniame komerciniame arbitraže, patirtis.
Firstly, in this master thesis the concepts of international commercial arbitration, parties of the arbitration and a state as a party to a dispute in international commercial arbitration are analysed. The analysis of the concept of international commercial arbitration shows that in author’s opinion the concept of international commercial arbitration determined in the Law of Commercial Arbitration of the Republic of Lithuania should be revised. Also the conclusion should be done that the problem of the content of the ‘state’ concept is existing in both – practical and theoretical levels. As the practice regarding this question is not well-established, after the analysis of the existing theories the application of the mixed theory of the concept of the ‘state’ is suggested. Moreover in this master thesis the possibility to bind the non-signatories to arbitration agreement and questions of the immunity of a state in international commercial arbitration are analysed. Those institutes are raising a number of practical problems as on the one hand the threat to bind the non-signatory of the arbitration agreement arises and on another hand the possibility that the award of the arbitral tribunal will not be recognized and/or enforced exists. It is suggested to solve both problems by including special terms into the agreement by which the arbitration agreement is concluded with a state – i. e. it is suggested for the parties clearly to indicate in the agreement the persons that shall be bound by the arbitration agreement and separately to establish the possibility to apply/not to apply the immunity of a state. Also in this master thesis a number of procedural and material legal and political peculiarities when a dispute in international commercial arbitration concerns the state are analysed. It should be also recognized that the Republic of Lithuania also appears as a party to a dispute in international commercial arbitration, besides, it also faces and presumably will face the problems analysed in this master thesis.