Ginčų sprendimas pagal 1982 m. JT Jūrų teisės konvenciją
Povilanskas, Mindaugas |
Jakulevičienė, Lyra | Darbo gynimo komisijos narys / Thesis Defence Board Member |
Gineitis, Alvydas | Darbo gynimo komisijos narys / Thesis Defence Board Member |
Katuoka, Saulius | Darbo gynimo komisijos pirmininkas / Thesis Defence Board Chairman |
Sauliūnas, Darius | Recenzentas / Rewiewer |
Žilinskas, Justinas | Darbo gynimo komisijos narys / Thesis Defence Board Member |
Staniulis, Darius | Darbo gynimo komisijos narys / Thesis Defence Board Member |
Biekša, Laurynas | Darbo gynimo komisijos narys / Thesis Defence Board Member |
Siniovas, Vladimiras | Darbo gynimo komisijos narys / Thesis Defence Board Member |
The title of the ending master‘s work- the solution of issues by the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Leading concepts: issues, issues of the International Law of the Sea, the international Law of the Sea, United Nations Convention, the International Court of Justice, the International Tribunal of the Law of the Sea, the arbitration, compulsory procedures. In the ending master’s work the question is raised, or the mechanism of issues’ solution, which has been firmed in the 1982 Convention, secures the law for countries to choose acceptable procedures of issues’ solution freely, or compulsory procedures of issues’ solution secure an effective practice of the Convention. The work is consisted of three parts. The first part is devoted to define the issues’ concept of the International Law of the Sea and to discuss the historic process of their solution. In the second part the procedure of issues’ solution by countries choosing peaceful implements, is being discussed, also the right of countries and the duty to solve the issue by peaceful implements, are being emphasized. Furthermore, peculiarities of the reconciliation’s procedure solving issue of the International Law, are being given. In the third part compulsory procedures of the issues’ solution, allowing obligatory decisions, are being discussed. The choice’ facilities of compulsory issues’ solution’s institutions are being analyzed. Shortly, the jurisdiction of every institution of issue’s solution, are being disputed by the method of issues’ analysis. In conclusions, the meaning and the efficiency of procedures, firmed in the 1982 Convention, are being disputed. The implementations of the free choice of issues’ solution’s procedure are being appreciated.