Options
Konstitucinės justicijos institucijos Baltijos šalyse (Estija, Latvija, Lietuva)
Pilybaitė, Indrė |
Jarašiūnas, Egidijus | Darbo gynimo komisijos pirmininkas / Thesis Defence Board Chairman |
Žiobienė, Edita | Darbo gynimo komisijos narys / Thesis Defence Board Member |
Varaška, Mantas | Recenzentas / Rewiewer |
Mesonis, Gediminas | Darbo gynimo komisijos narys / Thesis Defence Board Member |
Vidrinskaitė, Saulė | Darbo gynimo komisijos narys / Thesis Defence Board Member |
Vainiutė, Milda | Darbo gynimo komisijos narys / Thesis Defence Board Member |
Abramavičius, Armanas | Darbo gynimo komisijos narys / Thesis Defence Board Member |
Vaitiekienė, Elena | Darbo gynimo komisijos narys / Thesis Defence Board Member |
In this work author pursuing to compare Estonian, Latvian and Lithuanian institutions of the constitutional justice, bring out similarities and differences. To take notice of place of these institutions in states government system, method of formation, judge status, jurisdiction of institutions, process basic features, and determined judgments legal force. Of every democratic countries law systems fundament is constitution, so it is very important to guarantee the supremacy of law. Undoubtedly institutions of constitutional justice takes up one of the important place in assurance of constitutional conformity in state. author analyses institutions which implement constitutional control in most related neighbor countries: Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia. In Lithuania and Latvia to fulfill this function there are established special institutions – Constitutional courts, meanwhile in Estonia this function is dedicated to supreme instance of common court system – Supreme Court, and if to make clear, one of constituent part of this court – Constitutional Review Chamber. Also, the fundamental models of constitutional justice and it's variety, and the history of constitutional justice institutions in Baltic states were discussed in brief in this work. Author analyses, why these institutions are considered to be a part of common court system. Basing on descriptive, comparative and analysis method were investigated the order of these institution formation, legal status of judges, the power of courts resolutions, what is rather similar in all three country's. After analysis of all three institutions competence there are noticed some differences in establishing and structure. To take into consideration subjects, who can apply to these constitutional justice institutions, author notices that the narrowest number of applicants is determined in Lithuania. To take in comparison process in constitutional justice institutions, author finds many similarities between Lithuanian and Latvian processes, which are regulated in details, differently than in Estonia, where the basic process form is written and there is no clear separation between process stages.