Проблемы теории и практики судебно-автороведческой классификационной экспертизы
| Author(s) | |
|---|---|
Кузниченко, Людмила | Харьковский НИИ судебных экспертиз |
Mykolo Romerio universitetas |
| Date Issued |
|---|
2005 |
Straipsnyje aptariami eksperto kompetencijos neatitinkantys uždaviniai, kuriuos dažnai pateikia ekspertui tyrėjas (teismas). Straipsnyje pateikiama klasifikacinių autorystės ekspertizių atlikimo praktikos Ukrainoje analizė. Šiuo metu vienas iš svarbiausių teismo autorystės nustatymo uždavinių yra kurti klasifikacinės ekspertizės bendrus teorinius pagrindus bei atskiras metodikas.
Investigator (court) takes interest in type of temperament, main features of character of author's "portrait" too. The competence of expert is very important thing in this way. To draw a conclusion expert cannot appeal to concrete date of such characteristics that are in the examining text. The competence of expert of authorship is to draw a conclusion only on the ground of examination's results of text's language and its-features that he! she did by himself/herself. The article also analyses the tasks that usually are giving to experts by investigators (judges) that are out of experts' competence. It is presented the results of analysis of practical classification's examinations of authorship that have been done in Ukraine. Now one of the most important questions of identification of authorship is to establish methodology and separate methods of classification's examinations.