Akademinės profesoriaus Mykolo Romerio nuostatos
Mykolo Romerio universitetas |
| Date Issued |
|---|
2010 |
Remiantis autentiškais prof. M. Romerio rengtų paskaitų studentams tekstuose formuluotais teiginiais bei kitais šaltiniais straipsnyje aptariamos svarbiausios šio iškilaus profesoriaus akademinės nuostatos, atskleidžiančios jo teiktą išskirtinę reikšmę paskaitoms, taip pat suvokiant ir joms būdingus trūkumus – jų vienašališkumą ir pasyvią klausytojų laikyseną – kompensuojamus kitomis studijų formomis, besiremiančiomis savarankišku studentų darbu. Straipsnyje taip pat aptariamas M. Romerio ne kartą pabrėžtas mokslo objektyvumo principas, itin aktualaus jo atstovaujamam konstitucinės teisės mokslui, kurio postulatus politinės jėgos kartais mėgina pasitelkti kiekviena savo tiesoms įrodinėti.
However, M. Römeris also envisaged some imperfections in his lectures because of their unilateral nature and the passivity of the audience. One of the means to partially counterbalance the imperfections mentioned by M. Römeris held that the students should endeavour to make abstracts of the lectures as well as other study forms based on discretionary student work. He applied an original colloquium system that would let him to not only get to know the students but also to allow the students to repeat the material. As for the students’ discretionary work he required the students to get acquainted with the texts of the constitutions as well as his recommended Lithuanian and foreign literature. Even after passing an exam, the professor used to make an extra tutorial in which the texts of the constitutions were analysed applying the knowledge gained during the course. In the sphere of study, M. Römeris constantly emphasized the principle of impartiality. This provision would become especially tender when related with the study of constitutional law, as historically on occasions, the political powers tried to use the constituion’s postulates while each arguing their own beliefs.