Sutartinių garantijų verslo pardavimo sutartyje prigimtis ir teisinis vertinimas
Mykolo Romerio universitetas |
| Date |
|---|
2009 |
Šiame straipsnyje nagrinėjami sutartinių garantijų verslo pirkimo-pardavimo sutartyje statuso ir teisinio vertinimo klausimai. Praktikoje plačiai paplitęs tokių garantijų naudojimas visų pirma kelia klausimų dėl pačių garantijų teisinio statuso, paskirties, įtakos pardavėjo teisinei atsakomybei už sutarties pažeidimus. Straipsnyje aptariamos sutartinių garantijų prielaidos, atskleidžiama jų esmė ir atsakomybės už jų pažeidimą ypatumai. Pagrindžiama, kad sutartinės pardavėjo garantijos yra vienos iš sutarčių sąlygų, kurių pažeidimas sukelia pardavėjui teisines pasekmes (civilinę atsakomybę) – pirkėjas įgyja teisę reikalauti atlyginti nuostolius, sumažinti pardavimo kainą ar net nutraukti sutartį. Tiesa, sutartyje gali būti numatyti tam tikri materialūs ar procedūriniai pardavėjo atsakomybės apribojimai.
Firstly, the premises, the concept and the purpose of the seller’s contractual warranties, as well as legal consequences of the breach of such warranties are examined. The formulated hypothesis is proved. The reasons for necessity of special consideration of the seller’s warranties in the business acquisition agreement are the insufficient statutory protection (particularly in share acquisition deals) of the buyer of the business (principle of caveat emptor), inadaptability of general statutory provisions, which regulate business sale transactions, as well as the lack of the related court practice. A warranty is an assurance of the existence of a fact by one party on which the other party to a transaction can rely. The article proves that the seller’s contractual warranties are a special type of contract terms which, once breached, cause the legal consequences for the seller (the contractual responsibility of the seller) – the buyer acquires a right of claim for loss, reduction of price and even termination of the agreement. The amount of damages normally is equal to the difference between the actual market value of the business and the market value the business would have had if the warranty had been true. The agreement can involve certain material or procedural limitations of the seller’s liability. However, such provisions must be reasonable and fair. Also any limitation of the liability is not possible in case of wilful misconduct or gross negligence of the seller. Additionally, a preconceived knowledge of the buyer about the falseness of the warranty will deprive the buyer of the right to claims in respect of the breach of the warranty, except where this clause is clearly agreed in the agreement.