Viešojo administravimo modernizavimo priežastys ir tendencijos
Šiaulių universiteto leidykla |
| Date |
|---|
2010 |
Straipsnyje analizuojamos viešojo administravimo modernizavimo priežastys, raida ir reformų tendencijos. Teigiama, kad 1968 m. sukurti „naujojo viešojo administravimo" principai praktikoje nebuvo įgyvendinti. Viešojo administravimo modernizavimas siejamas su į verslo vadybos principus orientuota ir 1978 m. prasidėjusia „naujosios viešosios vadybos" sklaida. Straipsnio autoriaus nuomone, tik paskutiniais metais viešojo administravimo srityje buvo pradėjus dominuoti ne į verslo vadybos elementus, bet į piliečių dalyvavimą nukreipta reformų kryptis. Pasaulinės ekonominės krizės sąlygomis viešojo administravimo reformos bus siejamos su tradiciniais ir inovaciniais valdymo metodais.
The article analyzes reasons, development as well as trends of the reforms of modernization of public administration. The aim of the article is to analyze the reasons of modernization of public administration in the end of the XX century and the beginning of the XXI century as well as contemporary trends of the public sector management. When analyzing the reasons for the modernization of public administration it is important to recognize that during the seventh and eighth decades of the XX century public sector organizations of the traditional neo-Weber Ian model and their activities have expanded dramatically. For example, the governments of the countries of Continental Western Europe have expanded their social obligations to citizens so widely that could not even fulfill all of them. The reasons for this ineffectiveness and inefficiency lie not only in the traditional public administration, but also in the resulting from it redistribution (social-democratic) model of welfare state, in which state administration by limiting private initiative started regulating economic processes and expanding social programs (not only for the socially least protected citizens). Governments of many Western countries while trying to combat the consequences of the economic and social crisis were seeking ways to maximize the efficiency of the public-sector. They were attempting to create such systems of public administration that could easily adapt to a rapidly changing external environment by giving the organiza¬tions' managers broad independence in acting (in the areas of personnel management, public resource usage, etc.).