An international answer to capturing corporate criminality
| Author | Affiliation |
|---|---|
Tariq, Mohammed Saleem |
Mykolo Romerio universitetas |
| Date |
|---|
2014 |
Verslo globalizacijos aplinkoje vis svarbesnė darosi korporatyvinės kaltės kategorija. Atsižvelgiant į tai, kad korupcija vis tvirčiau įsitvirtina verslo kultūroje, labai svarbu kovoti su esamomis didėjančio korporatyvinio nusikalstamumo tendencijomis. Straipsnyje analizuojamas Australijos Baudžiamojo kodekso 1995 m. aktas, kuris laikytinas pirmuoju žingsniu korporatyvinės kultūros doktrinoje kovojant su struktūriškai sudėtingais korporatyviniais nusikalstamo pobūdžio susitarimais.
at base level, a technique that has insulated multinational companies from criminal liability. In other jurisdictions, the paper reveals strained attempts to make a derivative fault based model work, which is unsuccessful. Disregarding the employees rank and status to some extent, a corporate body is seen to be held criminally liable where it has partially benefited as a result of its employees actions whether intended or not and whether initially prevented, preventable or not preventable. This paper will continue to examine and evaluate the only available realist model of corporate fault in workable form, as codified into the Australian Criminal Code Act 1995. The ‘corporate culture’ doctrine remedies the fallacies of a derivative approach and is successful against strategies employed by a larger institution, making it a workable model for capturing corporate fault. The rules pertaining to the model will be closely critiqued and viewed in light of a series of cases before concluding that this approach is the first step in the courses of action required against the evolution of structurally complex corporate arrangements.