Lietuvos valstybės ir teisės atgimimo koncepcijos formavimasis

Šiandieninė Lietuvos valstybė yra ne vien šiuolaikinių politinių procesų, bet ir XIII a. sukurtos, didingai penkis šimtmečius gyvavusios, po to du kartus agresyvių kaimynų pastangomis mėgintos ištrinti iš politinio Europos žemėlapio ir tiek pat kartų atgimusios valstybės istorinių teisinių tradicijų rezultatas. Straipsnyje siekiama atskleisti modernaus, pagal demokratijos kanonus tautiniu etnografiniu pagrindu tvarkomo Lietuvos valstybingumo sąsajų su istorine Lietuvos valstybe koncepcijos formavimosi aplinkybes, dviejų XX a. Lietuvos valstybės ir teisės atgimimų esmę ir prasmę.

Today’s Lithuania is the historical-legal result of many processes, including the creation of the country in the thirteen century, ongoing life during five hundred years, two annexations resulting in the disappearance from the political map and two rebirths. The tradition of statehood and extended experience has greatly contributed to its survival and its ability to regain statehood in the light of the changed political, economic and social circumstances. Upon the climax of the First World War, the reinstatement of the statehood of Lithuania has been influenced by favourable international situation, the popularity of the principle of nation’s free choice, and the decisive actions by the Lithuanian politicians. The relationship of the modern Lithuanian statehood with the historical state of Lithuania meant the continuity of this statehood, even though it was a multinational country. Without any other prospects upon the fall of other European empires, it has been replaced by the statehood based on national ethnicity. Together with the determination to manage the reinstated country of Lithuania according to the democratic principles, this was the main difference from the historical Lithuania. The state of Lithuania has managed to keep its own legal formal framework even though it has lost sovereignty upon annexation by the Soviet Union. The statehood has been reinstated once favourable circumstances came into place within the Union. The High Council of Lithuania has transformed from being a marionette structure forced upon by alien country into an instrument of parliamentary struggle for independence that has represented the second rebirth of the statehood of Lithuania. The formation of own law in both cases occurred by temporarily using current alien legislation that was not in conflict with the newly adopted constitutional legislation. The former has been gradually replaced by own legislation.