Laisvės atėmimo režimo reglamentavimo bei vykdymo atitikimas tarptautinius elgesio su nuteistaisiais standartus
Kazakas, Valdemaras |
Stalioraitis, Pranas | Darbo gynimo komisijos narys / Thesis Defence Board Member |
Mackevičius, Tomas | Recenzentas / Rewiewer |
Uscila, Rokas | Darbo gynimo komisijos narys / Thesis Defence Board Member |
Dermontas, Julius | Darbo gynimo komisijos narys / Thesis Defence Board Member |
Sakalauskas, Gintautas | Darbo gynimo komisijos pirmininkas / Thesis Defence Board Chairman |
SUMMARY The key words of this final master degree work “Correspondence and Implementation of Freedom Deprivation Regime with the International Standards on Prisoners Treatment” are freedom deprivation regime, international standards and prisoners’ rights. Since independence was got from Soviet Union in 1990 the main attention has been focused on creation of democratic state in Lithuania. The great attention is paid on protection of human rights and freedoms in course of progressive democratic process. This is one the main motives that prompts analysis of human freedom process in the field of punishment enforcement policy. After Lithuania become member of European Union, it is very important not to forget the European Council legal acts in the field of human rights: protection of human rights and freedoms becomes especial important. The European Prison Rules determines various principles or freedom deprivation punishment organisation, but in this work there are presented only legal regulation, organisation and assurance of freedom deprivation punishment’s regime. This problematic question is very actual because validation of the United Nations’ and the European Council’s documents are very different in the global legal geographic. So the main aim of this work is compliance of national legal acts, which regulate freedom deprivation punishment’s regime, with international standards in the field of freedom deprivation punishment’s regime analysis of compliance level by comparative method. There are analysis of conception of freedom deprivation punishment’s regime, differences and peculiarities between national and international documents. There were found and analysed problems and inadequacies of these documents.