Socialinės globos ir rūpybos teisinis reguliavimas ir jo socialinis veiksmingumas
Derkintytė, Simona |
Vaišvila, Alfonsas | Darbo gynimo komisijos pirmininkas / Thesis Defence Board Chairman |
Beinoravičius, Darijus | Darbo gynimo komisijos narys / Thesis Defence Board Member |
Spruogis, Ernestas | Darbo gynimo komisijos narys / Thesis Defence Board Member |
Arlauskas, Saulius | Darbo gynimo komisijos narys / Thesis Defence Board Member |
Šlapkauskas, Vytautas | Darbo gynimo komisijos narys / Thesis Defence Board Member |
Šimašius, Remigijus | Darbo gynimo komisijos narys / Thesis Defence Board Member |
The master work analyses the social efficiency of the social care’s legal regulation. The work consists of 3 parts. In the first part we analyse the consumption of social and legal care. In the second part we analyse the particularities of the social care’s legal regulation: 1) the norms of terminated ang long – term children care; 2 ) the norms of children care in foster family, household and children care institutions 3 ) the norms of child care sponsorship and 4) the care of legally incapable adults in home and social care institutions. In the third part we analyse the social efficiency of social care’s regulation. In the master work we used such methods as document analyses, law cases analyses and interview. The results of the reseach showed that: 1) Social work with child and his biological family is not enough during terminated care’s period. During long – term care’s period social work with child and his foster parents is not held at all. The reason of it is the deficit of social servises in community and the small number of specialists in the child protection servises. 2) The organization of of children care in foster family and household is not regulated enough. There’s no education system and methodics for foster parents. 3) The children from care homes are not prepared for the independent life, their rights to suitable life conditions, free time spending are violated because of the strict legal regulation of the children care homes activities, indeterminate responsibility of care homes administration. 4) Child care grants are often used not for the purpose because the control of child foster parents is not enough. The grants for the living apartament are not differentiated accoordingly to the economic posibilities of the region in wich child lives. 5) The organization of adult care is not regulated enough. There is no education system for adults carers. The control of carers activities is not regulated precisely. The responsibility of adults care homes administration is indeterminate. This causes the violation of legally incapable adults rights.