Kai kurie teismo nuosprendžio sampratos probleminiai aspektai

Straipsnyje kai kuriais aspektais analizuojama teismo sprendimo (nuosprendžio) samprata, t. y. gvildenamas teismo nuosprendžio įsiteisėjimo momentas, teismo nuosprendžio teisinės galios požymiai. Šiek tiek analizuojamas ir nuosprendžio turinys, motyvų reikšmė. Skiriama dėmesio teismo sprendimo autoritetui, svarstoma, kokie veiksniai jam turi įtakos (kaip, pvz., minėtas teismo sprendimo įsiteisėjimo momentas).

What is more, the author of the article analyses the relation between a final court judgement and the forms of control over a court judgement. A final judgement cannot be annulled at any time and the principle of legal certainty cannot be infringed. What is more, the procedure of appeal cannot minimize the authority of a final decision; therefore, the author of the article suggests a provision establishing that a judgement can be appealed under the procedure of cassation to be included in law. The second part of the article deals with an analysis of the legal power of a court decision. The author describes the main characteristics of the legal power of a court decision: obligation, subjectivity, consistence, stability proper administration of justice etc. The author discusses the meaning of the legal power of a court decision. In the third part the main characteristics of the content of a court decision are examined. Particular attention is paid to the motivation of a court decision as a feature of the decision. In particular, the author analyses what must be motivated in a court decision. In the third part the author presents some examples of criminal cases where criminal procedure law was violated due to insufficient motivation of the decisions. The article ends with conclusions.