Spatial planning instruments at the regional level in selected Central and Eastern European countries. Their legal and institutional dimensions
| Author | Affiliation | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nowak, Maciej J. | West Pomeranian University of Technology | PL | ||||||
Lukstiņa, Gunta | University of Latvia | LV | ||||||
Mitrea, Andrei | Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urban Planning | RO | ||||||
Petrişor, Alexandru-Ionuţ | Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urbanism | RO | Technical University of Moldova | MD | Urbanism and Sustainable Spatial Development URBAN-INCERC | RO | National Institute for Research and Development in Tourism | RO |
Kovács, Krisztina Filepné | Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences | HU | ||||||
Cimdiņš, Rūdolfs | University of Latvia | LV | ||||||
Jürgenson, Evelin | Estonian University of Life Sciences | EE | ||||||
Ladzianska, Zuzana | Slovak university of technology in Bratislava | SK | ||||||
Maruniak, Eugenia | Institute of Geography of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine | UA | ||||||
Palekha, Yuriy | State Enterprise “Ukrainian State Research Institute of Urban Design “DIPROMISTO” named after Y.M. Bilokon | UA | ||||||
Põdra, Kätlin | Estonian University of Life Sciences | EE | ||||||
Simeonova, Velislava | University of Barcelona | ES | ||||||
Yanchev, Pavel | Independent Researcher | BE | ||||||
Blaszke, Małgorzata | West Pomeranian University of Technology | PL |
| Date | Volume | Issue |
|---|---|---|
2025 | 00 | 00 |
The aim of this article is to identify the common features and differences of spatial planning instruments at the regional level in Central and Eastern Europe. The article compares institutional aspects concerning the regional level of spatial planning in Bulgaria, Estonia, Hungary, Lithuania, Latvia, Poland, Romania, Ukraine and Slovakia. Key regional documents in each country, linked to the spatial planning sphere, were identified. Two types of such documents were classified: development strategies with a spatial dimension and regional spatial plans. In countries where the spatial dimension is included in the strategies, the key issues are the definition of the functional and hierarchical structure of the land, the identification of functional areas and areas of particular importance from a development perspective. Most often, spatial plans distinguish the structure of the settlement network, the layout of the infrastructure network, areas suitable for development and areas requiring special protection.
| Journal | IF | AIF | AIF (min) | AIF (max) | Cat | AV | Year | Quartile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
International Planning Studies | 1.5 | 5.687 | 5.687 | 5.687 | 1 | 0.264 | 2024 | Q4 |
| Journal | IF | AIF | AIF (min) | AIF (max) | Cat | AV | Year | Quartile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
International Planning Studies | 1.5 | 5.687 | 5.687 | 5.687 | 1 | 0.264 | 2024 | Q4 |
| Journal | Cite Score | SNIP | SJR | Year | Quartile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
International Planning Studies | 4.4 | 1.111 | 0.683 | 2024 | Q2 |