Use this url to cite publication: https://cris.mruni.eu/cris/handle/007/16059
The Impact of the Judgement in Case C-219/17, Berlusconi and Fininvest, on Court Jurisdiction Regarding Legality of Acts by Institutions of Single Resolution Mechanism
Type of publication
Straipsnis kitame recenzuojamame leidinyje / Article in other peer-reviewed edition (S5)
Type of publication (old)
S4
Author(s)
Maarand, Märt |
Title
The Impact of the Judgement in Case C-219/17, Berlusconi and Fininvest, on Court Jurisdiction Regarding Legality of Acts by Institutions of Single Resolution Mechanism
Publisher
Vilnius: Mykolo Romerio universitetas, 2019
Date Issued
2019
Is part of
International Comparative Jurisprudence. ISSN 2351-6674, 2019, Vol. 5, No 2
Field of Science
Abstract
A case of the European Court of Justice C-219/17, Berlusconi and Fininvest, laid down important rules for differentiating between the jurisdictions of EU courts and national courts in actions challenging the final decisions of composite procedures in the Single Supervisory Mechanism. As this judgement does not cover all scenarios, nor are there such decisions regarding the Single Resolution Mechanism, a universal test is developed for revealing if EU courts or national courts have jurisdiction over acts of composite procedures in the Banking Union. This test is then implemented on the most important acts within the Single Resolution Mechanism.
Type of document
type::text::journal::journal article::research article
ISSN
2351-6674
Language
Anglų / English (en)
Access Rights
Atviroji prieiga / Open Access