Administracinių ginčų nagrinėjimo komisijos: kompetencija, ryšys su teismais, ateities perspektyvos
Meiliulis, Tomas |
KURPUVESAS, Vytautas | Recenzentas / Rewiewer |
Šulija, Vytautas | Darbo gynimo komisijos narys / Thesis Defence Board Member |
Šedbaras, Stasys | Darbo gynimo komisijos narys / Thesis Defence Board Member |
Žilinskas, Dainius | Darbo gynimo komisijos narys / Thesis Defence Board Member |
Urmonas, Algimantas | Darbo gynimo komisijos pirmininkas / Thesis Defence Board Chairman |
Kalesnykas, Raimundas | Darbo gynimo komisijos narys / Thesis Defence Board Member |
Dziegoraitis, Algimantas | Darbo gynimo komisijos narys / Thesis Defence Board Member |
Sabatauskas, Julius | Darbo gynimo komisijos narys / Thesis Defence Board Member |
Novikovas, Andriejus | Darbo gynimo komisijos narys / Thesis Defence Board Member |
The goal of government institutions is to serve people in every civilized democratic country in the world. Article 5 of the Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania states that “government institutions serves to people”. Every activity of government institutions should be settled so what it could operatively render professional assistance to every person. The primary purpose of the government institutions is to provide conditions to implement human rights and liberties. Government institutions are provided with a lot of powers for the implementation of this mission, they should facilitate and secure effective implementation of the functions attributed to the institution and join the implementation of human rights and liberties. The final paper analyzes Lithuanian and foreign institutions, which settle administrative disputes in appliance with non-judicial order, peculiarities of their activity. Actions of government institutions, often limit human rights and liberties without a reason or unlawfully, the purpose of the present paper is to ascertain the most efficient way to control actions of institutions. Chief Administrative Disputes Commission, Supreme Commission of Government Ethics and Commission of Tax Disputes can be acknowledged as dominant institutions, which settle administrative disputes. Administrative disputes are such legal disputes, which arise from legal relations regulated by the public law. Administrative disputes arise from legal relations of administrative nature, which are noted for arising in executive – administrative activity of government institutions.