Europos Sąjungos teisės viršenybės principas valstybių narių nacionalinėje teisėje
Gudonis, Almantas |
Samuilytė, Aistė | Darbo gynimo komisijos narys / Thesis Defence Board Member |
Ravluševičius, Pavelas | Darbo gynimo komisijos narys / Thesis Defence Board Member |
Vėgėlė, Ignas | Darbo gynimo komisijos pirmininkas / Thesis Defence Board Chairman |
Tamavičiūtė, Vitalija | Darbo gynimo komisijos narys / Thesis Defence Board Member |
Kybartienė, Eglė | Recenzentas / Rewiewer |
Šiame darbe atliktas ES teisės viršenybės principo pripažinimo tyrimas ES teisėje ir valstybių narių nacionalinėje teisėje, taip pat Lietuvos Respublikos teisėje. Pirmoje šio darbo dalyje atliktas ES teisės viršenybės principo ES teisėje tyrimas. Atskleista ES teisės viršenybės principo prigimtis ES teisėje, aptarta ETT praktika plėtojant ES teisės viršenybės principo koncepciją ir suformuluota ES teisės viršenybės principo ES teisėje samprata šiandien, parodanti ES teisės viršenybės principo pripažinimo valstybėse narėse maksimalią apimtį. Antroje šio darbo dalyje atliktas ES teisės viršenybės principo pripažinimo valstybių narių nacionalinėje teisėje tyrimas ir nustatytas ES teisės viršenybės principo pripažinimo lygis tiriamosiose valstybėse narėse.
This is research of European Union (EU) law's supremacy principle and fulfilled analysis nature of this principle and development of EU law's supremacy in EU and recognizing it on domestic law systems of member states and in Lithuania’s law system. EU law's supremacy principal acknowledging process of member states indicates that the constitutional basis of EC law supremacy principle should be on the basis of national constitutional law by the members of the EU, and the main actors who invoke this principle are national courts, especially Constitutional Courts of member states. The research of this job shows what level of acknowledging process took place in some member states. This level is result of assessment national constitutional provisions and judicial practice. One group of member states have a good constitutional basis and recognizing practice in the national courts i.e. United Kingdom, Sweden and Finland. Another group of member states have sufficient constitutional basis and recognizing practice in the national courts i.e. Austria, Netherlands and Greece and. Next group of member states have satisfactory or insufficient constitutional basis and recognizing practice in the national courts i.e. Belgium and Luxemburg Member countries of the same group like, Slovenia ant Portugal have satisfactory constitutional basis but partly recognizing judicial practice. Lithuania is taking a special place between Luxemburg or Belgium and Czech Republic, because Lithuania has a good constitutional basis, but judicial practice probably is not fully recognizing. Another group of member states have all spectrum of constitutional basis, but the practice in national courts indicate that these countries choose negate way for EU law recognizing practice. Ireland has a good constitutional basis, Germany, France and Poland – sufficient constitutional basis, Denmark and Spain have satisfactory constitutional basis, but all countries do not recognize full EU law supremacy principle in self domestic law system. Special place are taking Italy and Latvia, only they have insufficient constitutional basis and negation practice.