Tarptautiniai jūrų teisės šaltiniai žmogaus, laivų ir krovinių gelbėjimo klausimais
Gineitis, Alvydas | Recenzentas / Rewiewer |
Jakulevičienė, Lyra | Darbo gynimo komisijos narys / Thesis Defence Board Member |
Staniulis, Darius | Darbo gynimo komisijos narys / Thesis Defence Board Member |
Biekša, Laurynas | Darbo gynimo komisijos narys / Thesis Defence Board Member |
Siniovas, Vladimiras | Darbo gynimo komisijos narys / Thesis Defence Board Member |
Katuoka, Saulius | Darbo gynimo komisijos pirmininkas / Thesis Defence Board Chairman |
Gineitis, Alvydas | Darbo gynimo komisijos narys / Thesis Defence Board Member |
Žilinskas, Justinas | Darbo gynimo komisijos narys / Thesis Defence Board Member |
The first attempt at some general unifications of the relevant principles of the law of the salvage occurred at a meeting of the CMI committee (established in 1897) in 1905 which led to the conclusion of the Brussels SALVAGE 1910. There was apparent lack of clarity in some respects. Convention left a number of important topics assumed and unmentioned. The first comprehensive attempt to codify and review the law of the salvage after 1910 is to be found in the London SALVAGE Convention. There were first incorporated in the new edition of Lloyd’s Form known as LOF 90, LOF 95 and now by law into LOF2000. Meanwhile, the growth in passenger liner services meant more people were exposed to that risk. SOLAS Convention states that each contracting government undertakes to ensure that any necessary arrangements are made for coast watching and for the rescue of persons in distress at sea around its coasts. These arrangements should include the establishment, operation and maintenance of such maritime safety facilities as are deemed practicable and necessary. Although the obligation of ships to assist vessels in distress was enshrined both in tradition and in international treaties (such as SOLAS), until the International Convention on Maritime Search and Rescue (SAR) adopted in 1979, no international system covered search and rescue operations. In some areas there was a well-established organization able to provide assistance promptly and efficiently, in others there was nothing at all. Coordination and control of search and rescue operations was organized by each individual country in accordance with its own requirements and as dictated by its own resources. As a result, national organizational plans were developed along different lines. The dissimilarity of such plans and the lack of agreed and standardized procedures on a worldwide basis gave rise to difficulties, particularly at the initial stages of alert. In some cases, this resulted in an uneconomical use of search and rescue facilities or in unnecessary duplication of effort.