Nepagrįsto praturtėjimo instituto taikymo aspektai, kai turtas nesąžiningai buvo įgytas informacinių technologijų taikymo pasėkoje

Abstract

The article deals with unjust enrichment, or receipt of property without supporting the Institute as one of the ways that can be applied to the assets acquired by fraudulent use of information technologies as a result. Analysing the Institute of unjust enrichment origin concept and application features, the author also reviews the doctrine of the civil rights opinions expressed by other civil remedies applicable to the property fraudulently acquired as a result of information technology. This article aims - to discuss the unjust enrichment or receipt of property without the application of reason to institute aspects of the property fraudulently acquired as a result of information technology. Originality and relevance of the topic due to the fact that the civil and economic realities of today's turnover is almost entirely based on various technologies, payments by bank transfers, information exchange in various emerging technologies, financial transactions take place via SMS and so on. Meanwhile, the discussed conditions between the parties in the paper documents, when economy and technology forces us to live fast, often in general, not cleared. The research leads to the suggestion that pre-trial litigation and disputes are becoming increasingly complex, and the correct solution affects not only the injured party, and many other participants in the civil turnover of the rights and responsibilities, and the detailed analysis and suggestions on the proper regulation of these problems could pave the way to begin solving the existing problems in today's information society. For the purposes of a systematic, comparative, historical and other research methods, the article discusses some of the unjust enrichment rules governing the application of aspects of the property fraudulently acquired as a result of information technology.