Atidalijimo iš bendrosios dalinės nuosavybės įgyvendinimo problemos Lietuvos teismų praktikoje
Mykolo Romerio universitetas |
| Date |
|---|
2009 |
Taip pat siekiama pagrįsti nuostatą, kad laikantis bendraturčių interesų pusiausvyros taisyklės atidalijant prioritetas turi būti teikiamas bendraturčio dalies atskyrimui natūra, o kompensacija pinigais vertintina tik kaip išimtinis dalies iš bendrosios dalinės nuosavybės atskyrimo būdas. Vienam iš bendraturčių nesutinkant su tokiu atidalijimo būdu, kompensacijos priteisimas gali reikšti priverstinį išpirkimą, todėl jis gali būti taikomas tik tada, kai bendraturtis, siekiantis savo dalies atskyrimo, išnaudoja visas galimybes perleisti savo dalį tretiesiems asmenims.
The second part of this article deals with the problem of the mode of partitioning, provided no agreement is reached between the co-owners. It is argued that the priority in solvingthis problem should be given to the partition in kind; and compensation in money, as a mode of partition, can be applied only if it is not possible to divide the property in kind without disproportionate damage to its destination and only according to the co-owner’s consent. Otherwise it can be treated as forced redemption, violating the co-owners’ constitutional right to property. Therefore, it is concluded that in case it is impossible to divide the property in kind and it is determined that the interests of the co-owner demanding partition by a judicial procedure can be fulfilled by transferring his share of the property held in common partial divided ownership to any third person, the claim of this co-owner should be dismissed on the ground that the mode of partition infringes the balance of interests of the co-owners.